STI and HSI

This is for self reference only.

Below shows the STI index. Poised for a retracement. Possible entry points, 166X, 163X there abouts. I like the 166X support level, as it is the gap support, near to ema 50d support and a trend line coming from June/July last year (touching jan high this year). Could be significant.




The chart below is for HSI. Same pattern as STI.

Read More

The mathematics of effort and results

If you start to value your time, you'll realise that being a perfectionist is a very silly thing to do. Why is that so? Effort is not equal to results. In life, I've seen countless examples of people who seemingly put in minimum effort but reaped maximum benefits. This is also known as working smart, not working hard.

I can't agree more.

While showering, I've derived the mathematics of effort and results. It is actually an exponential graph (I'll spare you the equation because it's the form that matters, not the exactness) which looks something like what I've attached below.


Initially, a little effort will reap a lot of results. However, as more and more effort is piled on top of previous effort, the results increment gets smaller and smaller, until it finally plateaus off. The main idea here is that the results reaped is not exactly linear to the effort that you put in.

Here are some examples that I can imagine:

1. A student gets 40 marks out of 100 for his test. He puts in a 10% more effort, he gets 60 marks out of 100. He puts in another 10% more effort, he gets 70 marks. He puts in another 10%, he gets 75%. To reach 90 marks, he'll have to put in a lot a lot more effort than the initial 10% effort that pushed his grades from 40 marks to 60 marks.

2 A woman had a weight of 70 kg. She tries to jog and her weight drops to 60kg. To lose the next 10 kg, she'll have to run harder and faster than before.

There is a region in which the sweet zone is found - this is where the effort put in is reaping the maximum results before the increment tapers off to a plateau. It's your job to define it and find the balance point yourself. If you value your time, just don't be a perfectionist - the effort that you put in to perfect your act might be better spent on other more value-creating actions.

That being said, there are some activities where maximum effort must be put into before a sizeable result can be observed. But once reached, the result will shoot up exponentially without requiring further effort (as shown below).




This kind of activities require patience and usually involve some kind of leverage on either time or money or both. It is also your duty to find and do such activities and work towards that final exponential increment.

I can think of a few examples too:

1. Trading/investing in the stock market. The initial outlay of effort is tremendous, to say the least, since the 'effort' usually involves financial losses as well. However, once the sweet spot is reached, the results will exponentially increase without you putting in a lot more effort.

2. Setting up a successful business. Key word is 'successful'. The initial time and money used to set it up is discouraging in the early stages of the business, but once it starts to take off, the sky becomes the limit.

Have you been doing your part to allocate your time and effort wisely in order to place a higher value on your life-energy?

Read More

Sunday's rambling

I browsed through Sunday Times today and noticed that there is an article on the low rate of interest provided by financial institutions in Singapore recently, presumably due to the plunging SIBOR rate, again presumably because the world's central banks are cutting their rates to boost the economy.

It's interesting that every politician have a fetish for growth. It's quite impossible to generate growth forever you know. Imagine that a hypothetical bacteria doubles their population every one minute - meaning a growth rate of 100% per min. If this rate goes on forever, we'll be covered by bacteria in maybe a few months? But this will not happen because somewhere along the nice growth rate on paper, there will be a limit to this whole growth process. In the case of the growing bacteria, either they run out of space, or they run out of food, or their toxins emitted kill each other, or all of them at the same time. I guess economic growth is the same too.

I looked at the article and there are suggestions by different people on what is the best place to put your $50,000. Almost all of them suggest at least a small part in equities related instrument, either 'safe' blue chips or a few well diversified funds.

If you ask me, where you are going to put your $50k depends very much on what you intend to do with the $50k. Are you saving up for short term use - like getting a property, a car or marriage within 2-3 years? Are you saving up for your child's education in 25 yrs time? Are you saving up for retirement in 40 yrs time? Basically the longer the time frame, the more you should put into equities related instruments. If now is not the best time to invest, when is it? 2006? 2007? If you need the money in 2-3 yrs time, I'm not so sure what you put into the equities market can be recovered in this time frame. Hence, if you can't afford to lose your capital in the event of pre-matured cash out, then don't put it there.

I'm put most of my money in MMF because of my short term needs (see my post on Budgeting for the near future). However, they are getting lesser and lesser returns (though I must add they are still better than banks' rate), with monthly returns dropping from 0.17% per month in May 2007 to around 0.06% in Feb 2009. This means that the returns per annum dropped from around 2% to 0.7%. I think I'll stop putting money and perhaps draw some out of it. The risk of losing the money in MMF (though low probability) is not worth the 0.06% returns per month I'm getting from it, especially since I'm not going to put it there for the long term.

For those interested, mine is the Phillips MMF. Here's the unit price for year 2009.



Here's the graph plotting for the unit price of Phillips MMF since I started tracking in May 2007. Can you see the shift in gradient starting in 2008?

Read More

An epilogue

Today, a pet chinchilla passed away.

In its short life span, it had brought many joys. I asked my gf if she will still have the chinchilla, knowing that it will die at this particular day in advance. She said yes - the joys of having it is so much more than the sorrow that it brings her and so it's worth it.

Life is fragile. It pays well to reflect on who you've been neglecting as you hurdle over life's daily struggle.



Rest in peace, little one, for you'll be in raisin-land with all the other chinchillas.

Read More

Sick of s-shares

Do you know what s-shares stand for?

S-shares stands for stupid shares. Actually they are Singapore listed, China-based companies. What have they done to incur the wrath of investors locally? Let's trace it...


1. All began with Ferrochina. The details are hazy, but it goes more or less like this: Debtors force ferrochina to repay their short term debts, and nobody wants to lend ferrochina money to tide them over. Company declared bankrupt, and shareholders 'dieded'. Suspended from trading.


2. China printing & 'Dying' - this one is comically, though not so funny to shareholders. The husband and wife CEO team from the parent company went runnng. Suspended from trading.


3. Fibrechem – auditors have problems finalizing the trade receivables and cash balances at 31st December 2008. Shares are suspended from trading now.


4. Beauty china – Some party wanted to buy over the shares of the CEO, who is a major shareholder himself, as his stakes take up 38.7% of the total shareholdings. It seems that part of the shares sold by the CEO are due to margin calls - which means that the CEO had pledged his shares to do some borrowings. Suspended.


5. Sino-env - CEO had a company, who pledged his shares in sino-env as a pledge to hedge funds. Now, unable to repay their payment obligations, hedge funds threaten to sell off shares. Might affect the company's solvency and ability to pay off bond holders. Suspended.


6. Oriental century – Subsidiary of Raffles education. This is the most recent case where s-shares are involved. CEO substantially inflated sales and cash balances and had diverted unspecified sums to an interested party. There are fictitious accounting and related records, thus leading everyone to believe that the cash they had were in existence. Raffles education shares, who held 29% of oriental century, are halted from trading now. Oriental century shares are suspended from trading.




So who’s the next one to fall? These incidents reflect very poorly on s-shares because of the lack of good corporate governance. If the statements they published publicly cannot be trusted, nobody can do a proper valuation of the company and determine how strong their financial standing is currently. This will affect investors’ ability to judge for themselves the strength and prospect of a company. It’s a shame that such low quality companies are allowed to be listed in SGX.

I remembered fondly in 2006 that any company with CHINA as their names will do very well as punters bid them up, citing very valid and logical reasons like China being able to decouple from US, China being the next powerhouse etc. It’s great that I didn’t participate much in this orgy, though my sins are equally as bad – I bought some of them on the way down.

I’ve two s-shares currently (I do not consider pac andes as s-shares, since they are not china based companies, more like HK based) – china milk and hongguo. Both reported okay business – still making profits but lesser amounts. Both of them share a common attribute, which is they have excellent cash positions. Now, I would have to wonder if the cash reported are really there or not. It sucks big time to me because I can’t even be sure if there accounts are true!

You know what? I’m sick of s-shares.

Read More

Budgeting for the near future

I was trying to determine the big ticket cash outflow in the near future over the weekend. The 3 biggest ticket items are car, property and wedding. I roughly know the first two and set budget for them already, so I need to estimate how much I have to cough out for the wedding.

I started by writing down the names of the guests I wish to invite for the dinner. At last count, there are around 85 people, with maybe another 40 more coming from friends of both parents. This works out to be 125 guests to be invited, or assuming a table capacity of 10 guests, a total of 13 tables. Let’s just raise it up to 16 tables, in case there are extra.

Since there are only a small number of tables, I thought it’ll be better to have a dinner at a high end restaurant rather than be contented with a middle range hotel. That needs to be worked out with my gf. So assuming $1200 per table, I need to fork out $19,200. From what I asked around, the wedding package of bridal gown plus photos/video should cost around $6000. Add to this the cost of the wedding rings/bands, which I budgeted to be at $5000, we’ll have a grand total of $30,200. To be on the safe side, I’ll increase it to $35,000, which is a near 16% markup for conservative budgeting purpose.

For car, my total budget is around $30,000, which I intend to pay 50% as down payment and borrow the rest so as not to over stretch my cash coffer. With this budget, I narrowed down to 2 cars – first is a new Kia picanto, the other is a 2-3 years old Honda jazz. I’m undecided as to which is a better bargain, but that’s not important yet in this planning exercise. I strictly do not want my budget to exceed $35,000. Period. Let’s just use the budget of $35,000 to begin with, and my intention of paying 50% upfront means I have to fork out $17,500.

For property, I intend to get a 600-800k property for investment purpose. Assuming a 30% down payment, I need to raise 180-240k cash for it. This might be a little too big for me to swallow, so I’ll have to look for co-investors to share the down payment and mortgage payment. Still, my budget for property is only 100k, so I either have to find enough people to share the burden or just reduce the size of the property I’m looking out for.


Let’s tally the figures:

1. Car purchase: $17,500 which I’ll need by end 2009
2. Marriage: $35,000 which I’ll need by end 2010
3. Property: $100,000 which I’ll need by around 2010 to 2012

Total: $152,500


Assumptions:

1. I have to pay all the things myself, which is quite a valid assumption for now. My parents are definitely not going to chip in. My wild card here is the contribution from gf and her family. I assumed my wild card doesn’t exist.

2. I heard people saying that I can recover 80% of the wedding banquet expenditure. Since my banquet expenditure is estimated to be $15,300, this means I can recover back $15,360. I rather not bet on it. Let’s just assume that I get nothing back.


Cashflow

Getting the car and the property will increase my monthly expenditure as I need to repay the interest and principal of borrowing. The car should set me back by around $1000 per month (includes everything) while the property should at most set me back by around $1000 per month too, assuming that I have 2 person to share the burden with. That will set me back by $2000 per month, meaning that I have less to save unless my income increases by an equivalent amount too.

Of course, the point of buying a car for me is to increase my income, so even though my expenditure is 1k per month, I might/might not be able to break even/make more. The second thing is about the mortgage for the property loan. Best case is that the rental can more than cover the mortgage, generating cash flow for me. Worst case is that there’s no rental and I have to bleed 1k per month till I exit from the property. I’m totally fine with the worst case scenario. The more likely scenario is that my gf can help to ease my burden for both of the debts I incurred, which up till now I have not considered yet. That will greatly improve my situation and most likely I can retain my savings rate of more than 50% monthly income.


3 yr plan from early 2009 to end 2011

I have enough cash to cover both the car down payment and the marriage, which I’m very glad. This means that till end 2010, I do not need to accelerate my savings (like selling off my stocks to raise cash). I have 2 years – 2009 and 2010 – to save up, which at my current rate of 50k per year, I should be able to accumulate 100k for the property at end 2011. The critical period is from 2010 to 2011, as I might need to accelerate my savings before the property market flies off. However, if the market from 1998 to 2003 is any indication of future trend, there might be a period of consolidation while buyers and sellers fight it out. If that happens, I will have more time to accumulate savings for property. If I purchase the property 3 years later at 2012, I’ll have even more cash to buffer.

Read More

Value of time

Time is getting tighter for me these days. I remembered fondly years ago, that I'll have time to walk around shopping malls and have the leisure to stand and stare. I can go jogging around 4pm, or swimming at 1pm - those are the days. Still, to get out of the rat race, this is the little sacrifice one must make to quicken the process a little.

Dream mentioned that I must take time to smell the flowers. I agree fully. If yesterday is a cancelled cheque, tomorrow is a promissory note, then today is cash on hand. While planning for the future is important, I cannot be too blind to the good things happening to me presently. One must be thankful not only for the good things that happened, but more importantly, for the bad things that never happen.



Here's something meaningful:

To realise the value of one year;
Ask a student who has failed a final exam.

To realise the value of one month;
Ask a mother who has given birth to a prematured baby.

To realise the value of one week;
Ask an editor of a weekly newspaper.

To realise the value of one hour;
Ask lovers who are waiting to meet.

To realise the value of one minute;
Ask someone who has missed a train, bus or plane.

To realise the value of one second;
Ask someone who has survivied an accident.

To realise the value of one millisecond;
Ask someone who has won a silver medal in the Olympics.

Read More

My ideas on insurance

As a lay person to insurance, it is not easy to ‘break into’ the knowledge banks of insurance. While I profess that I’m no way near a level where I can tell people what to do with their insurance, at least for now, I understand my own insurance needs and plans – which is the raison d’etre for wanting to know more about insurance.


Let’s just talk about the difference between a whole life plan and a term plan. A whole life plan is an insurance policy where the insured gets a cash value, usually towards the 3rd year of the policy. This cash value will grow in value, and it consists of two parts – the non-guaranteed part (usually projected at 3.75% or 5.75% pa) and another guaranteed part. The whole life insurance plan puts the premium that you pay into a participating fund (par fund for short). This par fund consists of a mix of assets, usually more geared towards bonds (higher percentage) and equities (lower percentage). Back in the heydays of bull markets, insurance policies of olden days project their non-guaranteed returns at a rate of 7-10% (that’s what I heard from others) and the selling point of these policies is the high cash values (as always, compared to fixed or savings accounts in banks) that the insured stands to gain when he cashes it out. I think it didn’t work out too nicely when the insured realized that the actual cash value is so far off the projected returns years down the road.


Well, on paper, anything goes. The best and most sophisticated model might not yield the most accurate predictions. Hence, for me, I never like to look at the non-guaranteed part of the cash value. It’s better to plan your life on not having the non-guaranteed portion than to have a shock in the future. This philosophy of not looking at the non-guaranteed portion of any cash values in policies extends not only to whole life but to other savings plans too. I just never look at the non-guaranteed part of the cash values. Call me a conservative if you wish.




To me, insurance is not about investment. I do not think highly of mixing insurance with investment. Obviously not everyone thinks the same as me, hence it’s crucial to decide how you treat insurance. As KK puts it, are you treating insurance as an expense or as an investment? If you treat it as an expense like me, you’ll want a cheap insurance with maximum coverage in terms of both breadth (i.e. how much coverage) and length (i.e. duration of coverage). You’ll not care for any cash benefits or returns because this is immaterial to your purpose of buying insurance. On the other hand, if you treat insurance as an investment, then you’ll want to worry about how much returns you are getting, and whether the returns are mostly in guaranteed part or non-guaranteed part, the composition of the par fund etc.


There are no bad insurance products, just a mismatch between products and the buyer. If you want to be serious in being financially independent, you’ll have to take responsibility in finding out more about insurance as it’s an integral part of being financially responsible to yourself and your family.


Now, what about term plans? Term plans, firstly, have no cash values to talk about. It’s purely for insurance and the premiums you paid are not put into the par fund to grow it. Hence, the premiums are usually much cheaper (around 4 times cheaper, all else being equal).


I think it’ll be good to list the comparison between term plan and whole life plans here:


Personally, I’m holding 2 whole life policies. One is a traditional whole life policy where the policy will be in-force as long as the premiums are paid. The other is a limited payment whole life plan where the premiums are paid for a period of your choice of 10 yrs, 15 yrs, 20 yrs, 25 yrs etc, but the policy will be in force till you expire (or up to age 100).


The reasons I bought and the reasons I’m holding are quite different. Since the reasons why I bought are less than stellar, let’s talk more about why I’m still holding on to the whole life plans:


1. For the limited payment whole life plan, I like the fact that after a period of 15 years (I chose it), I do not have to pay for the premiums anymore. This will cover me for 100k for the rest of my life, with an additional option to change to an annuity upon hitting a certain age. This means that I will not have to pay for the premiums for this plan when I reached age 45, well before my retirement age. This certainty is well worth the extra premiums I paid for this plan.


2. The limited payment whole life plan will be my base insurance coverage till I expire. I have no intention to convert to an annuity plan nor to cash it out, otherwise I would not have any more coverage. Should I hit any unfortunate event after I cashed out my plan or converted to annuity, my savings will be eroded. This is not something I would want to happen towards the end of my life.


3. The other traditional whole life plan I will have to cut upon hitting retirement. I wonder how I can pay the premiums to keep the policy in force after I stopped working. Hence towards the end of last year, I started to cut the initial 180k coverage to 50k to reduce the premiums paid. Thus, I would have a sum of money ready the moment I decided to cash out this policy.


Having settled my base insurance, I will next work on temporary coverage using term plans. This will start as soon as I start my family. The reasons why I chose term plans are:


1. The term plans is to boost my insurance coverage in case something happens to me, so my dependents will need a sum of money to maintain their current lifestyle. But as my dependents get less dependent on me, I do not need to have such coverage anymore.


2. Ideally, I plan to boost my insurance coverage using term plan, for a period of D+25 years, where D is the year where my last child is born. 25 years should be sufficient time for the last child to earn his/her own keep and hence will no longer be dependent on me. The term plan should also be sufficiently cheaper than whole life plans, so the financial burden will not be too great on me.


The whole idea here is to use a combination of whole life and term plans to achieve exactly the goals you want to achieve for insurance. Limited whole life plan to act as a base insurance coverage, topped with term plans to boost coverage until the dependents get less dependent. Of course, other essentials like hospitalization and surgery (H&S) plans, personal accident (PA) plans and disability income plans are crucial for a well rounded insurance coverage. Perhaps more on those in future posts.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Note that I'm not a qualified financial advisor. I'm just posting my thoughts on it, and I do not advise anyone to follow my own philosophy towards insurance. Do seek the proper advice if you need more help. There is a possibility that the information given here is wrong. Hey, what do you expect from a layperson trying to break into the insurance bank? Gimme a break (literally)

Read More

Personal finance distilled

You know, I've been reading a lot of books on personal finance. But after reading a great variety of them, you'll get a rough idea of what most of them advocates. I'll attempt to summarise those few pointers that I get from reading all these books (don't ask me which book mentions what, I seriously can't remember).


1. Know your expenses well.

This is very easily said, but hard to follow. I've been tracking my expenses for more than a year already, so everytime I spend money, you'll see me whip out my handphone and key in the amount so that I can tally up to my spreadsheet. Initially I wanted to do it only for a few months as I thought it's quite insane to do this, but after a while, it began to look like a sort of game. Every month, I'll tally up and see how the graph looks like, thus motivating me further.



The graph above shows my own expenses vs income for last year 2008. The difference between the blue (expenses) and the red (income) is my savings. That is extremely motivating for me to see my savings growing more.


2. Pay yourself first

This is more for people with fixed salary. Most books will recommend people to save up a portion of their salary and deduct a fixed percentage of say 30% into another 'untouchable' account. The rest, they can spend it to pay for bills and their monthly expenditures. This is essentially a forced savings, somewhat like CPF, except that you have more say on how much you want to contribute.

For variable income people (like me), what I do is that I'll put into my 'untouchable' account as soon as I have a sizeable amount. For example, if I have more than 1.5k in my bank, I'll put in 1k into that untouchable account. This requires more active managing, because I have to think about the near term cash outflow. I do not ever want to withdraw money out of the untouchable account unless absolutely necessary, so if I didn't plan out properly, I'll run in short term cashflow problems.

This kind of savings is significant. If one takes home a pay of $3,000 and pay himself 30% first, he'll get $10,800 in a year, excluding interest. Do not belittle it. It'll be even more if he pays himself 40% first, amounting to a huge sum of $14,400 in one year.


3. Identify your needs and wants

This comes as a result of first knowing what your expenses are, from step 1. If you do not know how much you spend on what, it's hard to audit your expenses to manage it better. It's important to identify your needs and wants because wants are not necessary.

Usually before I buy something, I'll have an intense desire to get it straightway. There's no point in reasoning out because the reasons will always expand to fill the desire. What I'll do is that I'll cool myself off for a time period, then if I still think I have to do with it, I'll go and buy it. For my accoustic guitar, I've been toying with the idea of buying it for almost 2 years. It cost slightly less than $300. For a CD that I really like, maybe I'll delay buying for up to 6 months or more. If I still like it, I'll get it.

Can you delay your gratifications, sometimes indefinitely? That being said, one must not feel deprived for doing without it. Enough is a balancing point between too much and too little.


4. Understand and manage your debts

Don't get yourself immersed in debts. Certain debts are good and others are bad. If you want to buy a car, but you can't have the money, so you borrow 100% of the amount and pay off in 10 yrs - that's very bad debt. How does one differentiate between good and bad debts?

For me, I classify things into assets or liabilties. Things that allow me to increase my money are my assets. Things that suck in money from me are my liabilities. For example, I would like to buy a car so that I can work harder and faster. With my own sets of wheels, I can save a lot more time, reach places a lot faster and probably squeeze in a few more work. It's more than worth the cost of the payment. Here, I'm borrowing to leverage on time.

For those that depreciate in value (like car or a washing machine), it's not wise to borrow money to pay for it. Some people I know borrow money for renovation, wedding, television sets etc...those are really bad debts.


5. Earn more money

I've seldom read books that tell you this thing. Earning more income is possibly the best way to save (i.e. if you don't spend more to 'reward' yourself too). There's plenty of ways to earn more - do a better job and try to get promoted or teach some skills that you can do very well. Most will probably choose tuition as it's easy and provides a healthy cashflow. With one student, you can possibly bring in an extra $200-$300 in per month, instead of lying in the sofa watching tv on weekends. How about teaching roller blades, cycling, swimming, baking etc?


6. Have adequate insurance

I've known people with less than adequate insurance. There are many insurances one can buy, ranging from:

1. Life insurance (death benefit)
2. Critical illness (like heart attacks, cancers, strokes etc)
3. Hospital and surgical insurance
4. Accident plans (can include things like dengue fever)
5. Elderly care (for those who are old and have problem fulfilling some basic acts of being a healthy independent human being)
6. Disability income (if you can't work because of disability, you'll get an income for a period of time)

Different life stages will require different kinds of coverage. For my life stage, I'll probably need more critical illness, hospital and surgical insurance and perhaps death benefits. The thing about insurance is this: it's equally bad to over insure and to under insure. If one over-insures, he is paying a lot more money than needed for the possibility of a claim event happening. If one under-insures, he have to folk out more money in the event that something happens. Both are equally not optimum. But from what I see, it seems there's less possibility of people being over insured, haha

What's the purpose of insurance? It helps to pass some of the risk to others. Can you afford to pay for $XXX,XXX in the event of cancer striking? If you can't fork out the amount of money, it's better to pay $X,XXX per year for a limited amount of time in order to pass the risk to others. As simple as that.

This issue about insurance deserves an article on its own, so I'll stop here. For now, it's suffice to say that without proper insurance, all the savings you've built up will be wiped out. Such events might be rare, but it's possible and probable. If you've read Black swan theory, it's always these exceptional circumstances that will have significant impact on your lives, so prepare yourself for it.

Read More

Woe be to those who missed out ROE

I was just waiting for the bus to come when I thought more in depth about the concept of return on equities, otherwise known as ROE for short. It’s not those little things that you put onto sushi though.



WARNING: THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST CHEAM AND LONGEST POST I EVER DID ON ACCOUNTINGS. PROCEED WITH CAUTION.

ROE, usually denoted as a percentage, is defined as the net profits per equities of a company. Equity is the amount that is left when you subtract total liabilities from total assets. In this article, I’ll explore the idea of how difficulty it is to maintain a consistent ROE throughout the years. I figured out an example while waiting for the bus, so I’ll just use that one to illustrate.

Suppose Bullythebear Company (BTB for short) is opening for business. To start off the business, BTB managed to raise $150 from venture capitalist. However, because BTB still needs to buy some fixed asset to kick start the business, it’ll have to borrow $50 from the Kingpin. Being a kind soul, Kingpin do not require any interest to be paid up, so there is no interest charged on the $50. BTB will immediately have a cash/cash equivalent of $200, listed as a component under the assets column. The balance sheet will look somewhat like this:




BTB proceed to buy a piece of machinery (that can be used forever and hence do not need depreciation charges at all) that is used to produce the revenue, costing a princely sum of $120 paid up front without credit. Hence, from the cash/cash equivalent of $200, $120 of which will be used up, leaving $80 (200 – 120 = 80) left. The balance sheet looks like this:




So after the first year of business, BTB made a revenue of $100, and after all the costs and taxes involved, retains a net profit of $52. The $52 will be received immediately and will add to the initial $80 cash, hence the cash/cash equivalent will be raised from $80 to $132 (80+52 = 132). There is a corresponding entry in equity under retained earnings, which is the exact amount as the cash/cash equivalent, being $52. The balance sheet and income statement looks like this:




Let’s do some FA for the company at this present moment.

ROE is 25.74% (52/(150+52) = 25.74%).
Net margins is 52.0% (52/100 = 52%)
Financial leverage is 1.25 ((132+120)/202)
Asset turnover is 0.40 (100/(132+120))

Hey, not bad numbers at all!

Into the second year, BTB manages to raise revenue by 15%, which is pretty decent. Unfortunately, the direct and indirect costs associated with making the revenue also increases proportionately, creating a net profit of $59.80. Again, this sum is collected in full without credit and thus increases both the cash/cash equivalent and the retained earnings. The balance sheet and income statement looks like this:



Take a look at the figures now
Revenue increment: 15%
ROE is 22.84%
Net margins is 52%
Financial leverage is 1.19
Asset turnover is 0.37

Hey, the ROE drop from 25.74% in the first year to 22.84% in the second year, even though the company is pretty decent. The net margin remains the same and the revenue increase by 15%. This is the difficulties that company faces when they want to maintain their ROE – it’s not easy, especially when they hold their retained earnings in cash which is sitting there earning a miserable interest. The more the company earns, the harder it will have to work in order to maintain the same ROE because the asset base increases!

Let’s see what happens in year 3 when there is a great year for our BTB company, with revenue increasing by 29.6%. Here’s the balance sheet and income statement:



Here are the figures:
Revenue increment: 29.6%
ROE is 22.84%
Net margins is 52%
Financial leverage is 1.15
Asset turnover is 0.38

Here, the ROE is maintained at 22.84%, same as the previous year. But look what it takes to achieve this same consistent ROE feat – a revenue increment of nearly 30%. Can you see how hard it is to keep on maintaining the same ROE again and again, year after year? It takes not only good use of the retained earnings, but also great management insight to invest the excess earned every year to good use. It’s not easy at all!

Here's a few insights that I gained by doing this rather rigorous way of exploring how ROE numbers are generated:

1. ROE is very difficult to maintain. Every year, the management will have to decide on how to maintain ROE, which isn't fun at all. Holding too much cash is great, but it'll drag down the ROE. Invest more into their business - what if they can't generate the kind of returns? Management will also have to think about giving back earnings in terms of dividends, especially when they are not confident of using it wisely. The worst they can do is to invest in non-core business for the sake of expanding their empire. It'll drag down ROE, suck up precious cash, and even have to spend money to get out of it eventually.

2. This comes as a surprise actually. I knew it but never really thought hard about it. Financial leverage drops as one gets more and more asset base. This is the result of increasing the asset faster than one's borrowings. Just by retaining cash, the financial leverage ratio drops substantially.

3. I've a much better understanding of the relationships between the 3 statements found in financial reports. I used to do all these accounting in the past (I blogged it an article found here), as part of my journey to learn fundamental analysis, and I remembered I took half a day to do just a simple tracking. This one, I did it in 1 hour. Hey, practise do make prefect - just keep staring and crunching numbers for 1 full year, it'll work wonders.

4. I start to appreciate more when I see companies with high and consistent ROE. Take a look at Hongguo:

----------ROE(%)
2003------19.68
2004------20.49
2005------22.46
2006------22.31
2007------22.30
2008------19.7 (*)

* estimation based on 9M08's ROE

Read More

Celestial

I’ve got another request by one of the superfriends to do a review on Celestial. I’ve covered Celestial quite some time ago, around end of 2007 I believe, so I think it’s a good time that I revisit this company again and see what had transpired between then and now.

Celestial is in the business of manufacturing soyabean protein-based food and beverage products and is selling them under its own brand name. They are also entering the biodiesel business which began a trial run last Oct 2008.

For this review, I’m only reading their 3QFY08 results, which they released back in November last year. Here’s a few statistics (based on 9MFY08 data):

Net margins: 22.8%
ROE: 25.7%
Annualised diluted EPS (assuming conversion of bonds to shares): SGD 0.14
Current assets/Current liabilities: 1.3
Total assets/Total equities : 1.73
Total liabilities/Total equities: 0.73
PE (based on today’s price of 0.340) = 2.4x

Here are a few things that I noticed and thought about:


1. Net margins are pretty high at 22.8%. However, compared to FY06, their net margins are at 31.9%. Even last year’s net margin was at 23.3%. We are definitely seeing some trends in the erosion of their net profits. I’ll say they are being held hostage by the high prices of soya bean. This can be seen in their Cost of good sold (COGS) as a percentage of their revenue. Since the last time I tracked this, their COGS (as a % of revenue) had increased from 55.7% in FY06, to 61.0% in FY07 and to the present 64.9% for the 9 months into FY08.

This is something that they have not much control on. I’m not sure if they hedge the price of soya beans purchased with something like a commodity futures contract, somewhat like what SIA did to lock in future oil price.


2. Other expenses like distribution costs had also shot up sharply. We’re talking about close to 50% rise in 3Q08. Not sure how they distribute their products, and not sure if it’s linked to oil too. But I do know that Celestial needs to do more to control their costs, which are already eating up their once very healthy net margins.

Considering that their net margins are so easily eroded within a span of 3 years, perhaps they do not have much of an economic moat. That being said, a net margin of 20 % plus is nothing shameful.


3. They have been easing down on their financial leverage since I began tracking it. Their financial leverage (defined as total assets/total equities) went from 2.17 back in FY06 to 1.99 in FY07 to the current 1.73 in FY08. The secured borrowings they had made back in FY07 had been fully paid up, leaving SGD 243 mil unsecured borrowings to be payable within one year or less (as at 30th Sept, 2008). This is from the zero coupon convertible bonds issued on 12th June, 2006, with a maturity of 5 years i.e. 12th June, 2011.

The price of the conversion of the bonds to share was adjusted to $2.47 per share. With the current crisis looming and the low share price of Celestial (last transacted at $0.340), I doubt if many shareholders will want to convert their bonds to shares, especially when the conversion price is like 7+ times more than the current share price.

They mentioned that if the bondholders held on till maturity (i.e. June, 2011), Celestial have to pay 129.263% of the principal amount (S$235 mil) by then. This means that Celestial will have to cough up nearly SGD 303 mil (RMB 1,515 mil) in 2011, assuming none of the bondholders convert to shares. That is a potential time bomb waiting to explode.

They did, however, have cash/cash equivalents of RMB 1,397 mil sitting at their company’s coffers now. It depends on how wisely they plan to use this amount of cash. Spend it foolishly and they will have to borrow more money to repay the bondholders when it approaches 2011. Would it be easier to borrow money then? I do not have the answers.


4. ROE (annualized) for FY08 is an impressive 25.7%. It’ll be more enlightening to look at the breakup of the ROE and tracking it over the years, since I have the data at hand.

------------------Financial leverage-----asset turnover-----net margins-----ROE
FY2006--------------2.17------------------0.38------------------31.9%------------26.3%
FY2007--------------1.99------------------0.52------------------23.3%------------24.1%
FY2008*-------------1.73------------------0.65------------------22.8%------------25.7%

* FY08 figures are estimated on the basis of the figures given in the 9M into the FY08. I assumed a straight trend leading to 4Q08 and the estimation can be wildly off the actual figures

We can see from the breakup of the ROE figures how Celestial improves it’s ROE. It is using less leverage (good sign), churning out more revenues per dollar of assets (good sign) but with lesser net profit margins (bad sign). I’ll say that the quality of their ROE is actually better, even though it’s lower than FY06, because it’s not as highly leveraged.

ROE of above 20% is still impressive, at least to me.


4. Current ratio is good at 1.3x, but I’ve no past figures to guide me on this. But let’s look at the absolute figures. They have RMB 1,971 mil worth of current assets, of which 71% consists of cash/cash equivalents. Assuming a bad debt of 50% on their trade/receivables and zero value on their inventories, their adjusted current assets will stand at RMB 1637 mil, which is more than enough to cover all their total liabilities amounting to RMB 1,532 mil.

I think no worries on their solvency in the near term. Of course, if businesses are affected, there’ll be more bad debts, the liabilities will also shoot up…but that will be anybody’s guess.


5. Operating cashflow which is coming in is good. However, one huge figure worries me, which is the amount of cash that flows out due to their investment in their plant, property and equipment (PPE). For the 9MFY08, cash comes in at RMB 380 mil, but flows out at RMB 470 mil due to investment in their fixed assets, and another RMB 160 mil flows out from financing activities. No wonder they need to issue convertible bonds to raise money. I do not know their plans for expansions in the near term…are they going to invest more money into their PPE? If not, things will go fine and they can even give out some dividends and have some remaining to save up for rainy days.


6. The management seems to have prepared for the eventuality of the bondholders redemption in 2011. They are already planning to look into different re-financing options. More updates on this potential time bomb will be given come FY08 full year results, so they say. Due to this, they also chose not to declare any cash dividends for the FY08 – this means next quarter when they close the results of the year, no hope on getting any dividends. This is a prudent and conservative approach taken by the management to ensure the long term survivability of the company.

The new biodiesel business is in trial period, starting last Oct 2008. They are determining the prospect and strategy for this business, so it’s a good idea not to hope for any positive contribution coming from this new business segment.


7. Ultimately, what to do for Celestial? Invest more to average down? Cut loss and move to supposedly more stable blue chips?

At PE of 2.4X, there’s not much expectations for Celestial based on the current price. I’m still worried about how they are controlling their expenses, which is eroding their margins. I do not think Celestial will be one of those companies that will go belly up, unless something drastic happens to the soya bean industry (look at what the milk scandal did to big players like Sanlu and Mengniu). Do take note of the potential convertible bond redemption coming closer to 2011. If bondholders redeem their monies, Celestial will have to seek new financing to pay them. If bondholders convert to shares (possible, but unlikely), there’ll be around 10% dilution to existing shareholders.

Read More

Data pulse

Trying to help out a fellow regarding his investment into this firm, Datapulse. From the books that I read, either this or Datacraft was one of the hotly punted stocks way back in the dot com era. I started browsing through the statements with a skeptical eye, knowing that Datapulse was dealing with those computer, gadgety stuff (they are actually providers of total solution to CD/DVD for content distributors in Asia Pac region). How good can they be. I think I'm wrong.

I only looked at their FY08 results released in 2008, Sept.

Net profit margins: 18.2%
ROE: 16.6%
Current assets/current liabilities: 4.0x
Total assets/Total equities: 1.25
Diluted EPS: 2.25 cents
PE (based on today's price of 0.135): 6x
Dividend yield : 14.8%

Here's my thoughts:

1. They must be doing something right. I thought the kind of business they are doing are so easily replicable and with not much of a competitive edge of others. But take a good look at their impressive net profit margins of 18.2%. This could be one off of course. ROE of 16.6% is pretty impressive too, especially for the kind of business they are doing. Usually for business geared towards manufacturing, I expect to see a rather lower ROE because of the high fixed cost perhaps coupled with high borrowings too. How wrong. Their ROE is hampered somewhat by the high cash/cash equivalents they are holding, but in these times, perhaps this is what prevents them from collapsing.

2. Looking at the current ratio and gearing, it's quite hard for me to see them needing any emergency cash to tide over current liquidity issues. Their current assets (of which 74.5% consists of cash/cash equivalents) can cover their current liabilities for 4 times. They have no problems with longer term debts too, with non-current liabilities consisting only of 24% of total liabilities. If they have no problems with short term liabilities, they wouldn't even have to blink for non-current liabilities.

In fact, their cash/cash equivalents of 45 mil can more than cover total liabilities of 20 mil PLUS dividend of 2 cents to every shares they own (around 11.9 mil) and still have 13.1 mil left over. Hey, do not belittle this penny share ok?

3. Based on the above rough calculation, I would say no problems to them continuing to give dividends in the future, IF they can maintain their business. A big IF, I know. Are they able to do that? I do not have the answers, as I do not have the expertise nor interest in their area of business.

4. Cash flow wise - a clean bill of health. Cash is coming in for sure. In fact, the quality of their recorded earnings are very good. Due to the accrual nature of accounting (and the fact that business give credit), what is recorded as earnings might not materialize as cash, so we might see a case where there is superb earnings but little cash flow. However, Datapulse's earnings are very much translated into cash flow. If we take their net profit of 13 mil, add in the non-cash depreciation charges of 7 mil, we can around 20 mil, which is exactly what their operating cash flow show. No nonsense at all.

The biggest cash flowing out is actually the dividends paid out to shareholders. This drains off around 12 mil from the company's coffer. For FY08, they are spendin a fair bit (5.7 mil) investing in their assets. Not sure what their plans are for the coming year, but I'm sure they won't be putting in so much into their capital expenditure.

In my opinion, no worries in terms of cashflow.

5. Good time to buy? With PE of 6x, dividend yield of 14.8%, low debts, good cashflow to pay off all debts and dividends, it seems not a bad option at all. One of the risk is that we do not know the extent of how the recession will affect the demand, and hence, their business. If business is affected, a lot of things mentioned here will also be affected. Another risk is whether there are better use for the money. Is there a better investment around?

If you treat this as a dividend play, it's not too bad. If they give their dividends of 2 cents per share forever (another big IF), you'll get back your investment capital in around 7 years. Probably faster since this rough calculation ignores capital gain. So if the real question to ask is really how stable their business is. Answer that, and the rest will follow.

Read More

Investment soul searching

I did more soul searching in terms of my investments education. I have changed my perspective drastically, even more so as the crisis unfolded right in my very eyes. Here’s a few important lessons that I wished I didn’t commit:


1. Mistaking luck for skill.

When the bull was charging at everything back in 2006 and 2007, I was blinded. I mistook skill for luck. I was dabbling in warrants even though I do not know anything about it, and trading counters like flipping burgers. The tragedy happened when I won, which emboldened me and I began to think that I had real skill. It didn’t take a few ups and downs to wash me out, since at that moment, I had no skill and had run out of luck.

What a humbling experience.


2. Disregarding dividends

After I stopped trading and deciding to see the market in terms of more fundamental aspects, I disregarded dividend stocks and wanted to go all out for growth. I thought that dividends giving stocks means that the company is at the matured stage in its corporate lifespan, hence it’s not going give me a lot of capital gains. Well, how wrong was I… I did not know the true relationship between value and growth – they are like a pair of chopsticks, and one couldn’t do without the other. In my desire to get maximum capital gains, I despised dividend stocks.

Little do I know that as part of the total returns of an investment, dividends are one of the most stable and significant portion contributing to it.

And when I realized how important dividends are, I swung to the other extreme of it. I bought dividends stocks without considering the price of the stock nor the prospects of future dividend payment. Both are equally sinful. So what have I learnt?

Do not disregard dividends when you buy a company. Yet do not buy a company solely on the dividends.


3. Not being satisfied with market returns

This is another humbling experience. When I started learning about valuation, I started to think that I know a lot. The safety of having an intrinsic value and subsequently buying below that value makes me feel safe in an illusory way. Thus lie the danger of knowing too little. I was at the top of the world and thought that I can get a return of 15% per annum.

Well, I still do not know if I can hit that kind of returns, but I certainly know that that is the average returns. This means that in certain years, one can get very bad returns which (hopefully) is offset by years with greater returns than the norm.

These days, I wondered if I will not do any better being satisfied with market returns. By market returns, I mean roughly 8-10% per annum over at least 10 years. For the effort that I put into my investment, and not seeing the results, I wonder if I am actually working hard but in the wrong direction. That’s discouraging, to say the least. Will it be better to satisfy oneself with market returns by buying into suitable instruments that mimics the market, and then allocate a small amount of one’s capital for such ‘luxuries’ as individual stock picking? Might not be such a bad idea at all.

To improve one’s situation, it is important to do a honest assessment of one’s current situation. Once you know where you stand, then you can plan to move forward.

Read More

Singpost 3Q08's result

Singpost announced their 3Q08 results today. As usual, their results are just that...boring. It's not doing exceptionally well, nor terribly bad either. It's just plodding along, so to speak. A few pointers to take note:

1. 3Q08's operating profit falls 1.2% compared to 3Q07. However, if excluding all extraordinary items, the net profit for both 3Q results are nearly the same.

2. Comparing 9M08 to 9M07, the operating profit dropped a little too (0.7%). Again, excluding all extraordinary items, the net profit for 9M08 is a little better, being 7.5% above 9M07. As mentioned, Singpost's result is nothing spectacular but nothing to worry about too.

3. I noticed that for 3Q08, the selling expenses went up nearly twice as much (43.5%). However, the absolute amount is quite insignificant, being just around 4% of the total expenses incurred for the same quarter. It's stated that they provided more in terms of doubtful doubts in view of the bad times. Singpost do need to curb their expenses though. The revenue for this quarter is up 1.6% from the last year, but the expenses expanded by 5.2%. Of course, this naturally dragged down the net profit for the quarter.

4. Diluted EPS for the past 9M08 is 5.891 cents. Today's closing is 77 cts. Thus, the PE is 9.8x based on annualised EPS for the past 9 months. For singpost's standard, this PE is actually quite low already. Still, in this kind of times, sub-10 PE is quite the normal. Maybe even sub-5.






5. Current assets for this quarter is 1.05, compared to 0.90 last quarter. There is an increase in the percentage of cash/cash equivalents over the current assets this quarter. Singpost increased its cash/cash equivalents to current assets from 57% last quarter to the present 62%. Since they do not hold much inventories, quick ratio is pretty irrelevant here. In my opnion, nothing to worry about them being unable to meet short term debts.

6. Long term debts consists of unsecured bonds, expiring on 11th April 2013 with fixed interest rate of 3.13% pa. This bonds actually forms a huge part of their total liabilties (58.3%), so it's important to see how they are able to pay for it when the time comes. There are still 4-5 years more to go before it's due, so I don't think there's a concern about that now.

7. Cash flow from operations are still coming in (a total of 63 mil). I doubt they are going to go into any major investing in their PPE, so net cash should still be positive. The major outflow of cash comes from payment of dividends to shareholders. It's 'bleeding' 24 mil this quarter. Overall, there is around 29 mil of cash entering their coffer this quarter, bringing their total cash/cash equivalent to 131 mil. If they are going to pay a special dividend next quarter (which they normally do, usually to a tune of twice the quarterly dividend i.e. 2.50 cents per share), it'll take away around 48 mil.

Is it likely? I think so. The payment period of their bonds are still far away, and they are still getting in a good cashflow of 60+ mil. Then again, last quarter was the better quarter for Singpost due to the holiday seasons, so 4Q might be slower. Still, there's still a good chance for them to pay special dividends next quarter. Let's see how the situation goes. At least 1.25 cents per quarter is their dividend policy, based on my buy price, I should be 'guaranteed' a yield of at least 4.2% pa.

Read More

The mechanics of learning something new

My story into the stock market is not exactly a standard one. By standard, I mean those who saw people earning lots of money and wanted to get into it. I was never attracted by the returns of the market, and back then when I started, I was not aware of how much is a good return anyway. I was more pushed into the market then pulled by it. Why so?

When I decided for myself back in 2006 that I needed to get an insurance, since I spent a good part of my life without any to begin with. I met up with my insurance agent and was subsequently was presented to take up two policies - one a whole life policy and another an investment linked policy (ILP). Not that I know any better back then. I have no clues to the differences between a whole and a term life, much less an ILP. The story is long and I've no wish to say it here, but let's just move forward and say that in my good fortune, I only bought the whole life without the ILP.

This got me really frustrated because having being bombarded by the agent on the good returns of ILP and such, I felt really stupid not knowing anything about it. I then realised that in all my life, I've no clues as to the fundamentals of financial planning. This nusiance of not being in the know pushes me to open a trading account and to begin learning.

It was hard learning up all the jargon and technicalities of the market. There wasn't any good resource (esp in Singapore) to begin learning. I have to trip and fall all the way to be a bit more knowledgeable in this area.




It seems like recently, I'll have to repeat this whole process of learning something new again. A new phase in my life had begun this year. I've decided to find out all that I can about the property market, as I wish to have an investment property in the near future. Again, I felt the stinking feeling of not knowing anything about the property market, and I have to feel and grope my way in the darkness. However, this time there's also a few knowledgeable folks (like dream) guiding me along. Utmost gratitude to him.

I wish to pen down my goals here, to whip me more into action and to have the motivation to carry on what I'm already doing.

1. Save $50,000 by end of 31st Dec, 2009

2. Finish all the blog articles in my bookmarks

3. Have a working knowledge of all there is to know about the property market, including but not limited to mortgages, property index, tenants, contracting, prospecting properties etc.

Looks like to survive in these modern times is not easy at all. You have to be a part-time fund manager and a part-time property agent in the process. I wonder how many more 'part-timer' roles I'll have to adopt to ensure a decent life and a good retirement in the future. Let me just end this with the key to learning something new: Learn something when the nuisance of not knowing becomes too unbearable.

Read More

Cbox premium subscription

The 6 months trial for the cbox premium is almost up. The subscription will cease on 8th Feb, 2009. Since I started this premium version, acting on the shareholder's vote upon the issue of the Circular, I must say I'm quite happy with the premium version of the cbox.

1. The premium cbox have the auto refresh function which I found it to be extremely useful. In fact, I would pay just for that option alone. Add to the fact that there is a noticeable 'click' sound upon arrival of new messages, it certainly makes going back to the normal cbox unbearable.


2. There is a lot more storage for past messages. The cbox is flowing as fast as the prices of DBS R shares, that at least 600 messages flow past per day when I returned to check every night. I think the actual messages is closer to 800-900, which is nearly 38 messages per hour. The cbox is active from 0830 till around 0300 in the morning, a total of 18.5 hours. This means almost 1 message is sent per minute.


3. The content of the cbox changes according to time and of course the crowd. In the market hours, the content will be dominated by traders. Towards the evening and night, it'll be more investing and lifestyle related. So much to chat?! haha :) The more valuable thing coming from the premium cbox is that I've been a bunch of superfriends.

I think I'll just sign up for another 2 years of the service. It'll cost $2.19 SGD per month, based on an exchange rate of 1.50 USD to 1 SGD. This is sustainable, since the ad revenue from the blog should be more than sufficient to cover the running costs of the cbox premium.

Read More

Paid lessons from the Market

A lot of things have changed for me since I switched from being a trader to an investor want-to-be. I must have mentioned it before, that in the past two years of being in the market, I've learned more about myself than I could have imagined possible. I thought I already know myself quite well....well, in the face of the markets (whether in bullish or bearish times), you'll also see yourself in a different light, I'm sure.

Here's some of the lessons that I've paid to Mr.Market to tutor me. I think the lessons are not unique, as I'm sure many of those who had been in the market long enough would have known. Not in any order of importance, here it goes:


1. It's important to realise if you're trading or investing. This is especially important to those hybrids or those trying to convert from one to another. The worst that can happen (to me that is ) is that when you're investing, you start to trade your positions and flip it like burgers in a fast food joint. Or when you're trading, you start to hold it like an investor. Both methods have different entry points - for investing, you do want to get the lowest price possible but for trading, you might have to buy while the trend is up, not neccessary at the lowest price.

Take my painful longcheer lessons. I thought I'm investing, but when the price drops below my buy price, I do not want to take the losses. I convinced myself that I'm in for the long haul and tried to find 'fundamental' news that China is going to roll out their new 3G network soon. Didn't Warren Buffett buy and hold too?

Bullocks.


2. Take people's advice with a pinch of salt, or not at all. The advice is free, but whether it is applicable to you, only you can tell. This applies to all sorts of advice, including but not limited to those from your relatives, your close friends, experts, TV personality, financial advisors, brokerage reports and analysts. I'm asking you to be skeptical but not cynical - and that's a huge difference. Part of being open-minded is to allow yourself to be in a position of doubt, to be uncertain of your own situation and yet not be confused.

When I started out, I tried to get my hands on all sorts of brokerage reports. I thought that since I'm a newbie, who am I to question the professionalism and expertise of those reports. I believed, I bought, I suffered. As for analysts, if you can change your positions as fast as they can change their target price, go ahead and listen to their recommendations.

By the way, my blog is also contributing to the noise level.




3. Do not be fooled by the certainty of numerical analysis. In valuation of a company, I'm all too quick to calculate this mysterious and elusive figure called intrinsic value. Why? As long as you buy below this intrinsic value by a certain level of margin, you're good. It can even help you find your returns into the future by projecting the dividends, PE, EPS and revenue etc.

Sorry to disappoint, but it's not easy at all. I learned that intrinsic value is such a misnomer. It should be more appropriately termed intrinsic-range-at-this-point-in-time. This holy grail in investing is a function of PE, EPS, future prospects, competitive advantages, macro-socio-economic situations, among others. The uncertainties attached to each of these inputs are unknown and each itself is a function of time. Hence, to be able to rationalise a value of a company up to 2 or 3 decimal points is really pushing it.

Numbers give the illusions of certainty, do not be fooled by it.


4. Spend more time on your career, it gives the best returns for most people. This is often not mentioned. Earning passive income from investing is all good and well, but where does the first drop of money comes from? It had to come from work itself. Spend more time earning as much as you happily can and savings as much as you can comfortably is the key to wealth.

The three pillars of financial management (at least for myself) is this: Savings, Protection, Investments. The order is chronologically and logically arranged. If you take your take-home pay and spend all that is necessary to keep your life in order, that is your savings. After amassing your savings, you need to protect it from unforeseen circumstances, hence you need insurance. Then AFTER all these, you can start looking at investments. Do not skip the order, e.g. invest before one is suitably insured.

Read More

Superfriends Forum

If you've been visiting my blog, you'll notice that there is this queer advertisement just above the cbox that reads SUPERFRIENDS.




Welcome to the SUPERFRIENDS FORUM! It's an extension of the cbox - a place where superheroes (and perhaps supervillians) gather. It is born out of a wish to have a private space of our own for those regular users to post things which are otherwise hard to put in the cbox. I know, the cbox flows faster than the ticks of the oil futures so it can be hard to follow. Hence, do join the forum for more information on where the next superfriends gathering is and so on.

I've no idea what sort of forum that will be, but let's take the back seats and let the forum grow organically on its own instead of planning for it. I'll like to take the chance to sincerely thank our superIT fren - Vault dweller - for his hardwork as the resident IT guy. All bow to him!

(I'm so glad that the blog is growing on its own accord without me. Like Vault dweller mentioned, it's a nice warm feeling to work on some little community project where all the like-minded folks gather. Hey guys and gals, you make my day!)

Read More

Exclaiming my disclaimer

As I was replying to the constant stream of people who are asking me questions on the DBS rights issue post, I suddenly thought of this: What if I'm doing more harm to them than good?

The comments and the questions kept on streaming day in and day out, and I just kept replying them. But somewhere in the 30th to 40th comments out of the present 68th comments, I reflected on the usefulness of it all. It's quite obvious from some of the questions that most people do not read the offer information statement (OIS) issued by DBS. There is a whole lot of information that pertains to almost any situations that anyone can think of, but somehow, perhaps the thick tome of the electronic bits and bytes (constiting of a total of 166 pages, mind you) does not make a leisurely read at all.

So why do I think I'm doing more harm than good?

1. I'll be breeding laziness. You know, it's so easy to ask questions, but to dig them out yourself is not all that easy. Just ask someone, it's infinitely easier.

2. I'm not an expert, so I might give information that to the best of my abilities is known to be the truth, but is in fact false. I mean I won't mislead others purposely, but to be frank, I didn't even read the whole of the OIS. I only read certain sections of it to find the information I needed to answer some of the questions. The rest is based on a mix of my past two experiences dealing with rights issue and common sense. What if I thought I was right but turned out to be wrong, and someone suffered financially because of it?




So for those who still have questions on the rights issue, do keep them coming. But mind this big disclaimer, I'm not a qualified advisor. Hey, if you win or lose money, I don't take responsibility lah, ok?

Read More

Nuffnang sent me a cheque!

After a long wait, I finally got my cheque in from Nuffnang :)

It's had been a rather long wait. Since I've cashed it out on 17th Nov, 2008, I've been waiting till 11th Jan 2009 before it was sent to my home address. Well, in a way, I deserved it because I wasn't aware that they only process the application for cashing out at the end of the month. So from 17th Nov to end of Nov 2008, the application is just waiting in a 'queue' to be cashed out. After that, the whole process will take 1 month, so that covers the entire Dec 2008. Once processed, it'll take at most 3 weeks for the cheque to be sent to my address. So for mine, it took slightly less than 2 weeks.

The amount is $129.55. Okay, why so much right? I can actually cash it out once I've accumulated $50. Since I've got to pay a administrative fee of $1 for every processing, I might as well save $2 for accumulating up to $130 there before cashing it out. I wanted to wait till $200 before cashing out but was not too sure how credible Nuffnang is, since I've no prior experience on collecting any real money from any advertorial companies. NOW it's confirmed - they do pay money!

I checked...I took a period from 16th Dec 2007 to 15th Nov 2008 before I clocked up this amount of ad revenue - roughly 11 months. So, that means I get around $11.78 every month, or $0.39 per day. Erm, not exactly a lot, but well ... it helps to pay off some bills and offset the premium cbox subscription! What's more important is that I get paid for doing something that I like and do everyday :)

Actually I should not count my eggs before they hatch - what if the cheque bounce?? Haha :) Just kidding Nuffnang guys, don't really go and make my cheque bounce!!




The cheque was enclosed in a 'postage prepaid envelope for standard regular mail up to 20g' - it's stated at the back of the envelope by one of the companies that I have a partial ownership in, Singpost. The stamp was already printed onto the envelope, which I thought was such a great idea because it saves the sender trouble from finding a stamp and affixing it onto an envelope. Nuffnang had their logos printed onto the envelope itself, with a cute message at the bottom, screaming loudly in capitalised bold - "NUFFNANG!!! YOUR MOOLA HAS ARRIVEDDD!!!!!". Not bad lah, didn't know Singpost had such a service. Maybe next time if/when I open a company, I can consider using such a service, haha!

The cheque was actually handwritten in those black ballpoint pen. The script is neat and very straight, meaning that it's not slanted to the left or the right. It's all in bold, and pretty small too. Not sure if the signature is by Ming, the co-founders, but it sure reads like it. Having read some fengshui book by Lilian Too on everyday fengshui, I would say the signature is not too 'uplifting'. An auspicious signature should be upward slanted in both the beginning and the end. In this signature, the first stroke is slanted diagonally to the bottom left. Afterwhich, the general direction of the signature goes diagonally to the upper right but towards the end, it went straight vertically down to a level below the beginning stroke. There's even a cross to mark the 'gravestone' ending. In technical analysis, we call this formation a doji - signifying uncertainty in the trend. The ending broke the 'support' formed by the beginning stroke - not auspicous at all, isn't it?

So, Mr/Miss Nuffnang co-founder, if you happen to read this, contact me for a small tip on how to change your signature to ensure that you HUAT everyday! There's still some advertising space above, so maybe if you want you can put your ads there too, hoho!

Read More